Hello and God Bless. I haven't had a chance to read any of the NSB yet, but I applaude your effort to recognize the one true God without bias. Yes trinitarinism is driven throughout the world but was not "adopted" or "accepted" until the fourth century and sealed by the Council of Nicene. Thank you for doing the right thing instead of just following the masses. I look forward to reading your work of love which conforms to the instructions in Ephesians 4:4, 5, and 6.

APPLAUSE!!!

Tony Peterson

THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH I WAS TRYING TO FIND A BIBLE THAT RESPECTED HIS HOLY NAME AND NOT PUT HIS TITLE WHERE HIS NAME SHOULD BE....
AGAIN THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!!!!!!!

Attempting to present a translation as unbiased at same time as stating "It does not espouse, adopt, embrace, or promote the Trinity" is an utter contradiction in terms. Such a statement exposes a clear bias- Antitrinitarianism. Besides that, saying the Bible does not teach God in 3 persons is as ridiculous as saying the Constitution "does not espouse, adopt, embrace, or promote" freedom. Of course it does; & it would take a true bias against freedom to state otherwise. So also, the hundreds of verses in both Old & New Testaments point towards the idea of God existing in 3 Persons & this link gives many of them- http://zoareanspurse.blogspot.com/2007/10/glory-of-jesus-christ.html

It really is quite pitiful for someone to "look" for a unique translation that suits their beliefs instead of accepting 2000 years of biblical scholarship & changing those beliefs. After all, why do you need a Bible at all if you are going to simply turn Genesis 1:27 on its head by creating (a) God in your own image? Why not just carry on with your forlorn assumptions without a Bible?

UPmomof6,

Your RESPECT for the Heavenly Father’s Name is well founded and I commend you for you such.

Yet you said that the pronunciation of the Heavenly Father’s Name is unknown
and that it is made-up of four consonant letters, but neither of these statements is true.

If you down load the module: - The Wars Of The Jews –
provided at: http://www.e-sword.net/extras.html
then go to BOOK V - CHAPTER 5.
paragraph 7. unto the 11th sentence thereof [you will find] -
"A mitre also of fine linen encompassed his head,
which was tied by a blue ribbon, about which there was another golden crown,
in which was engraven The Sacred Name: It consists of Four Vowels."
(Author: [Flavius] Josephus; a member of the priestly aristocracy of the Yews, from 55A.D.-100A.D.,
during the second Temple period while the Heavenly Father’s Name was still being taught to the Priest)

As four VOWELS they have their own sound and need no other vowels to help make the sound of the Name.

The foreign vowels E, O, and A were added by the Masorete Scribes after the return of the Yews from the Babylonian Exile, after: [Flavius] Josephus reign as a Priest in the second Temple, not to help aid with the pronunciation but to instruct the reader to substitute the Title Adonai instead.

The Iaudish Priest, not wanting to help the Gentile Messianic believers to pronounce the Heavenly Father’s Name, did not tell the English Bible writers that they had misunderstood the TRADITION of HIDING the pronunciation of the Heavenly Father’s Name, and stood silent as to the fact that the vowel pointings were foreign to the Name and there fore did not belong.

Being the English Translators did not know better they thought that the Original letters were consonants because vowel signs were added, and believed the added vowel pointings were necessary to help pronounce the Name.

By the way Tyndale, Coverdale, Bishops, and King Iames Versions spelled It Iehovah. The first letter being an I and not with a J, a vowel that when coupled in front of an A makes a Diphthong yă.
(See: Pronunciation Guide in the Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary. Also see: Tetragrammaton, within the Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary for a reference to the above stuff about the Heavenly Father’s Name)

Note that in the following 4 languages that the Tetragrammaton is spelled with FOUR VOWELS:
The Four (Hebrew) Vowels [not consonants]: יהוה {The Personal Name of Eloahim}
י - Yod - Produces a “ee" sound
ה - Heh - Here it produces an "ah sound”
ו - Vav - Transliterated "Waw" in English. Produces the "oo sound ", as in too
ה - Heh - Here it produces the "ay sound”

Transliterated by Four (Greek) vowels: Ιαβε {dubbed the Tetragrammaton}
Ι - Produces an “ee sound”
α - Produces an “ah sound”
β - Produces the “oo sound”, as in too
ε - Produces the “ay sound”

Transliterated by Four (Latin) vowels: IAUE {Transcription of the Tetragrammaton}
I - Produces a “ee" sound
a - Produces an “ah sound”
u - Produces the "oo sound", as in too
e - Produces the “ ay sound”

Once Again Accurately Transliterated / Transcribed by Four(English)Vowels: Iaue/Iawe or even
Jaue/Jawe/Yaue/Yawe [as all of these letters if not vowels are semi-vowels]
the "J"s in the bible names stand as a cursive "I"
I,E,Y,J(cursive I) - produce the "ee" sound
a - produces an “ah sound”
u/w - Produces the "oo sound", as in too
a/e - Produces the “ ay sound”

In the preceding Four Languages ( with their Appropriate Vowels )
the Tetragrammaton (a Four Vowel-Letter Name of the Hebrew Eloahim)
is to be pronounced as follows ( accented on the last syllable ):
Hebrew / Latin / English / Greek
ee ah - oo - AY

The O in the form Iehovah a.k.a.- Jehovah was not left out of the form Yahweh in particular,
but was left out altogether with the other foreign vowels.

By the way the W in Yahweh is to be pronounced as -oo-.

If you really want to know more about the Truth, read Chapter 9 found here at the following:
http://www.yahweh.org/PDF_index1.html
This Chapter in the book “The Sacred Name of Yahweh” explains every thing thoroughly,
and therefore should be no doubt about how the Heavenly Father’s Sacred Name is pronounced, unless one just wants to stick to TRADITION and not TRUTH.

Shalom,

will brinson: ferguson

Message erased by Sysadmin : Jonathon Content consititutes  לשון הרע
 

There are a number of contemporary Christian organizations that do not promote a Trinitarian understanding of the Bible.
 
It is entirely possible, indeed, statistically probable, that the individual who created this translation is neither currently, nor formerly associated with The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.
 
As such, speculation about the translator's theological associations is לשון הרע
 
jonathon
 
 

Message erased by Sysadmin : Jonathon Content consititutes  לשון הרע

(John 1:1 [KJV])
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

(John 1:1 [NSB])
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was like God (God-like).

(John 10:30 [KJV])
I and my Father are one.

(John 10:30 [NSB])
»The Father and I are one (united in purpose).«

(John 10:33 [KJV])
The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

(John 10:33 [NSB])
The Jews answered him: »We do not stone you for good work but for blasphemy. You are a man and you make yourself like God.« (John 1:1)